Corona Virus

Or maybe Conspiracy Cal is right ?

 

Yep it could be, I guess time will tell.

 

You flatter me. I don’t actually allege any specific conspiracy.

I have no firm idea WHY but I am pretty darnn certain we are being told fairy stories to justify decisions. Blatant scare tactics compounded by ‘case’ numbers out of kilter with clinical cases and chickens coming home to roost within the NHS. Mainstream media uncritically spouts propaganda and extrapolates individual cases as representative of ‘the new norm’. Masses of umbrellas going up and staff quietened or speaking out of turn.

Mass hysteria or sinister? Dunno but it’s definitely ‘hinky’ as Sweden, Florida etc., show. There ARE alternatives but the debate won’t be had....yet. However the cracks are growing. Weird changes in accumulated test results that are clearly down to process or manipulation because they do not reflect any biological rate of progression. All regions merging and taking off?

 

The " gray vote" is the single most important block vote , to all 1st world countries, and also the most at risk group.

Edit. Also the average age of our leaders and experts.

 

Gay or grey?

 

That's the idea, keep em happy.

 

I liked @Sprinter idea (I think it was- apologies if I have it wrong) of a specific Covid TV program which address various aspects of Covid... from generalised health advice (think long-Covid etc) to discussions about actual figures being reported. It could allow “scepticism” a real forum for debate... hell, it could have guest editors to control balanced content etc.
I’m not sure the Auntie is the best place for it (though it bloodywell should be).

 

Or maybe sponsored by big pharma

 

You might just check what ‘confirmed’ actually means in each country. In our case it means a positive PCR test which some studies show has a 91+% false positive rate. Another one of those inconvenient truths that cannot be suppressed indefinitely......
Symptomatic patients are a quite different matter.

 

You probably got this number from twitter?

 

I like this resource as relatively clear reading, but the stats are 2-3 weeks behind real time.


https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...es/articles/coronaviruscovid19/latestinsights


Should be interesting over the next few weeks

 

https://cormandrostenreview.com/cease-and-desist-order-fuellmich-drosten/

You can probably find it in French too. The pack of cards is creaking.

 

At the risk of boring Hubaxe, the underlying problem with counting ‘infections’ is the slavish use of PCR stats which overstate the problem by varying amounts because of issues with swabs, cross contamination and the cycles used. We should place limited faith in anything but symptomatic admissions.

 

I appreciate that Cal... but the link I provided was for deaths, not infections

 

Except it wasn’t, apologies

 

Nae botha! There is no statistical consistency between deaths and ‘infections’ aka ‘cases’ which tells its own story.

 

Ahh, there’s a filter button on the mobile link that shows just the deaths... I don’t know how to post just that dataset

 

Serious studies don't mention +90% false positive. That scam started from "One America News Network" relating false information wrongly attributed to the New York Time". And now spreaded on all conspi pages you like so much.

 

Like The Lancet? It has published papers insisting the UK testing is pretty unreliable. Just watch German Courts. Doubtless you won’t put any figure on a problem you deny even exists.