Dunno what’s worse. A) a tattoo of a hook in your arm, or B) a hook in your arm. Neither should be permanent.
And a very warm welcome to you Vanguard Am sure whoever had the work done will be more than happy in ten years otherwise he wouldn't have spent the time and money getting it done
Wow, such a bastion of positivity Luckily the individual is happy with the work Just as an aside, your car and bike will start to degrade with time, fading paintwork, minor scratches, scuffs, bits of surface rust.........does it stop you from buying them knowing it will not remain pristine over time?
As I said looks great now, I'm sure he is happy, problem with work that detailed is it doesn't stay detailed as over time as the skin changes.Yes my car will degrade but I can go out and buy a new one, a fairly irrelevant analogy but bless you for trying. You won't be able to remove that tattoo and start again will you.
Aren't you a little ray of sunshine.. It's all irrelevant anyway mate. The thread is called "awsome tattoos" - I reckon this one fits the bill?
Feckin "bless me" you condescending tw*t..............reckon I'll leave this now before I say anymore
Whatever it looks like in 10 years, it looks pretty awesome now. Very talented artist... Wonder how long it took.....
I think it may have lost it definition and look a bit fuzzy in 10 years. Kind of like this restoration that went wrong. No matter how great it looks now the tattoo will ultimately appear awful as the canvass gets fat and wrinkly and the ink spreads like a lumpy ink blot...